📌 这节课讲了什么
这节课只讲一条原则:问什么答什么。题目问的是「种类」,第一句就要给种类;题目问「有没有」,第一句就得答有或没有;题目问「A 还是 B」,第一句就要把站位亮出来。板书右上角专门列了一张「题目怎么问 → 第一句怎么答」的对照表。
课上用「网站 / 书」这条话题线把三种问法全跑了一遍:先答 what kinds of websites do you often visit,再答 Are there any changes to the websites you often visit,最后答 Do you prefer getting information from websites or books。
🧱 方法:题目问法 → 第一句答法
板书右侧竖着列了一张表,这是这节课的总纲:
| 题目怎么问 | 第一句怎么答 |
|---|---|
| what kinds | many(+ 具体种类) |
| are there ...? | yes / no |
| prefer A or B | in the middle ／ A lean towards ／ B gravitate towards |
板书在最后一行旁边写了中文:倾向于。也就是说,遇到 A 还是 B 的题,不一定非选一边——可以站中间(in the middle),也可以往某一边偏,lean towards / gravitate towards 就是把「偏」说出来的动词。
🧱 例一:what kinds of websites do you often visit?
板书把题面里的 websites 圈出来,旁边写着 many 和 social media——题目问 kinds,答案里就必须有「种类」,并且要有量词。
先给一句总起(板书标为「喜好表达」):
i have a wide range of interests in music, art and technology.
再举具体的种类:
rednote - practical tips for life.
technology related websites, OpenAI, DeepSeek
从「网站」往上升一层,说成「平台」:
more like platforms — where there are a whole bunch of people who wanna interact with others with the same interests and perceptions
然后把题目里的词收回来,合成一句:
many websites that i often visit are about music, art and technology
内容对我产生的影响 —— 板书单独记了一组表达:
- make me buy something
- me crave a restaurant
- plant a seed in my mind
I am so persuaded that I almost bought it yesterday.
some posts makes me wanna buy something and even crave restaurants that i haven't tried yet.
这道题的走法,板书给了四步: 先一句「喜好表达」垫底 → 再落具体的网站(rednote / 技术类)→ 升一层说成平台 → 最后用 many websites that i often visit are about ... 把题目收回来。四步走完,答案既扣题又不干巴。
🧱 例二:Are there any changes to the websites you often visit?
板书在这道题旁边写了一个词:protocol——答题是有流程的。
流程只有两步:先答「有没有」,再答「为什么 / 有什么」。
| 步骤 | 板书上的答法 |
|---|---|
| 先答有没有 | no there aren't any. ／ yes there are |
| 再答为什么 | because the layout and design perfect. ／ because I dont switch to another platform |
板书在中间还写了一个理由用词:versatile enough(足够全能)。
红箭头把这道题的两条支线分得很清楚:
- 走「有」的时候:有 → 有什么 → 为什么,中间要多走一步,先把变的是什么说清楚,再给理由;
- 走「没有」的时候:没有改变 → 为什么,理由直接跟上。
这就是板书在旁边写 protocol 的意思——顺序错了,理由再充分也像没答到点上。
「没有变化」这一支:
no there aren't any. because the layout and design perfect.
I dont wanna see any changes. because I dont switch to another platform, it's gonna be a long time for me to get used to it.
「有变化」这一支:
yes there are. they are more user-friendly.
板书在 user-friendly 旁边标了中文:用户友好。
接着说细节 —— 支付体验。 板书列了三组词:payment experience / check out / purchase experience,收在一个词上:is seamless,并标了中文「丝滑的」。
拿 JD 举例:
one tap away from buying something even as BIG as a 60 inch TV.
it does not require your password. it has your face ID stored.
In fact, they reduced a transaction that used to require at least 5 steps to just one step.
🧱 例三:Do you prefer getting information from websites or books?
板书把这题拆成两半来对:
| 问题类型 | 去哪儿找 |
|---|---|
| 简单问题 | 网站 |
| 大问题 | 书 |
网站这一侧板书列了:navigation(导航 app)、数学题 / location / reviews / it's worth buying——都是点一下就有答案的小问题。
书这一侧板书写的是:读完一本摄影的书 / book about photography。
但板书马上自己反问了一句:
would I read a book about photography to get to know whether a camera is worth buying? probably not.
站位怎么答。 板书把 prefer 那一栏的三个说法又搬了过来,落成一句:
I'm kind of in the middle
那真正的「大问题」呢? 板书在左下角单独圈了两个领域:医学 / 法律,旁边一个方框写着「解释」——这类需要被解释清楚的事情。板书给的例子是:
if i wanna be sure about the integrity of education consulting firm — institution that applies for universities' offers, study abroad agency.
这种问题的落点,板书最后还是给到网站:
from websites, not just websites, but what I should look for is word of mouth. which is "reviews"
review lots of cases.
this is something i can't get from books,
because reading is too time-consuming.
板书自己先用一句反问把「书」那条路堵掉:
would I read a book about photography to get to know whether a camera is worth buying? probably not.
这就是这道题真正的答法:先承认有「书」这一边,再用一句反问把票投给网站,最后拿 reviews / word of mouth 收尾。prefer 题不一定要斩钉截铁选一边,板书给的示范是 I'm kind of in the middle,但理由要给足。
💬 直接可以说出口的句子
把这些句子原样记下来,考场上换个题目也能用:
i have a wide range of interests in music, art and technology.
many websites that i often visit are about music, art and technology
some posts makes me wanna buy something and even crave restaurants that i haven't tried yet.
I am so persuaded that I almost bought it yesterday.
no there aren't any. because the layout and design perfect.
I dont wanna see any changes. because I dont switch to another platform, it's gonna be a long time for me to get used to it.
they are more user-friendly.
one tap away from buying something even as BIG as a 60 inch TV.
In fact, they reduced a transaction that used to require at least 5 steps to just one step.
this is something i can't get from books, because reading is too time-consuming.
📖 词汇与表达
| 英文 | 中文 | 搭配 / 用法 |
|---|---|---|
| a wide range of | 广泛的 | a wide range of interests |
| practical tips | 实用小技巧 | practical tips for life |
| technology related | 科技相关的 | technology related websites |
| platform | 平台 | more like platforms |
| a whole bunch of | 一大堆 | a whole bunch of people |
| interact with | 与……互动 | interact with others |
| perception | 认知、看法 | with the same interests and perceptions |
| crave | 特别想、馋 | crave a restaurant |
| plant a seed in my mind | 在心里种下一颗种子 | |
| persuade | 说服 | I am so persuaded that ... |
| protocol | 流程、规约 | 答题先答有没有,再答为什么 |
| layout | 布局 | the layout and design perfect |
| versatile | 多功能的、全能的 | versatile enough |
| user-friendly | 用户友好的 | they are more user-friendly |
| payment experience | 支付体验 | |
| check out | 结账 | |
| purchase experience | 购买体验 | |
| seamless | 丝滑的、无缝的 | is seamless |
| one tap away | 点一下就 | one tap away from buying something |
| transaction | 交易 | reduced a transaction ... to just one step |
| worth buying | 值得买 | whether it is worth buying |
| integrity | 诚信、可靠 | the integrity of education consulting firm |
| institution | 机构 | institution that applies for universities' offers |
| study abroad agency | 留学中介 | |
| word of mouth | 口碑 | what I should look for is word of mouth |
| review | 评论；翻看 | reviews；review lots of cases |
| time-consuming | 费时间的 | reading is too time-consuming |
| navigation | 导航 | navigation app |
⚠️ 提醒 / 易错
- 问 kinds,答里必须出现种类和量。 板书在题面旁边直接写了 many —— 题目问的是什么,第一句的主体就得是什么。
- 「有没有」的题有 protocol。 先答 yes / no,再给 because;不要一上来就讲原因,让人听不出你到底答的是哪一边。
- prefer A or B 不必硬选边。 in the middle / lean towards / gravitate towards 都是合法答案,板书给的示范就是 I'm kind of in the middle。
- 答案要把题目的词收回来。 板书那句 many websites that i often visit are about music, art and technology,就是把题面里的词原样接回答案里。
- 大问题也未必要去翻书。 板书最后仍然把落点放在网站上——word of mouth / reviews,理由是 reading is too time-consuming。
